Mailbox: Max S. Weremchuk
May 2000 – present

Page Top

Max S. Weremchuk – JND biographer

To: Max S. Weremchuk
weremchukATgmx.de
67283 Obrigheim, Germany
Mon, 1 May 2000

Dear Max,
Thank you for visiting 'My Brethren' and your comments regarding my statement that pages 17-18 "surprised me as being speculative and in the form of a novel".

• While that was my general impression at the time – you succeeded, perhaps too well, in your desire to make the introduction "novel-like" –
  • I should have restricted my remarks to the part in which you had "Darby reflecting on his past during the trip" and which you concede is "speculative".

• Based on your careful presentation, I do not doubt that you researched the circumstances of his last trip as carefully as the balance of the book.
  • And of course your summary of his service on pages 17-18 is factual.

Being unaware of your religious status, I was "surprised" because I had assumed, from the forewords, that you were connected with those who trace their 'genealogy' back to Mr. Darby.

• Such, it is my understanding, would normally eschew anything "novel-like" in their writings.

• This is definitely not a criticism of your approach for which, as an author, you are responsible.

In my judgment your fear that the book might "appear sterile and clinical" was quite unnecessary.

• I found the whole account quite absorbing and well presented.

• I look forward to re-reading it from time to time and am thankful for this opportunity of thanking you personally for your labour.

To correct any misapprehensions by other guests I am appending your email, and this reply, to my comments on your book in Biography: J. N. Darby - Part 2.

I hope you will visit MB again, and I would be glad to learn any of your own history which you might be free to share.

Yours in the Lord, Gordon.

From: Max S. Weremchuk
Tue, 2 May 2000

Dear Gordon,
Thank you very much for your reply.

Quite sometime has passed since I first wrote the Darby biography and then reworked it for the English edition. Slight corrections may be required here and there.

• I really put my heart and soul into it and checked and double-checked to be sure to have things as right as was possible for me to do.

• My goal was to present an accurate account – as much as that is humanly possible.

• But as all human endeavours, it is definitely not perfect and improvement is always necessary.

It is interesting to see you are from Toronto. I was born and raised in Niagara-on-the-lake, but moved to Germany in 1979. I married here and my wife and I have five children.

Brethren connections? Yes, I was raised among the Kelly-Lowe-Continental Brethren and attended their meetings here in Germany till 1991 when I left due to differing opinions on teaching matters.

• It was not that I felt I had to leave the Brethren, but that they were very uncomfortable with me.

• I still have contacts – here and worldwide.

• My paper "You Ran Well" certainly played a role leading up to my leaving.

• I have occasionally written papers dealing with problems within this K-L-C section of the Brethren.

Your "My Brethren" site is excellent. My compliments! How strong is the interest in it?

• I appreciated your section on Coates and wish there was more available about him.

Your brother in Christ, Max.

To: Max S. Weremchuk
Wed, 03 May 2000

Dear Max,
I can appreciate how you put your "heart and soul" into J.N.D.'s biography, and the result is evident.

My only disappointment – and it is somewhat selfish – is that you were not able to extend your work to his whole life.

• Having done a little writing, I well know the exercise to have everything as "accurate ... humanly possible",
  • even to using exactly the right words to convey the intended meaning and to avoid inevitable misunderstanding.

• But as has been said, the essence of good writing is re-writing.

Thanks for sharing your background, and that we were almost neighbours.

• I am familiar with K-L-C, having spent some time with them in my "wilderness" years of disillusionment and despair after the shameful Aberdeen events of 1970.

• I knew Jake Redekop to whom you refer in your foreword, and many others. Some of them "were very uncomfortable with me" as well.

• I did meet some dear brethren there whom I remember affectionately,
  • but it was a predictable mistake to identify with those opposed to truth to which I belatedly returned.

If you are able and free, I would appreciate a copy of your paper "You Ran Well" and any others of your "papers dealing with problems within this K-L-C section of the Brethren" for my personal use.

• As you no doubt realize, I am seriously interested in the history of all 'my brethren'.

• There have been vague reports of a recent rift in the 'reunion' under the terms "Wayne Decision vs. 'New' Movement". Any light you can shed on this would be welcome.

I'm glad you like my brief biography of Mr. Coates, which has been of interest to several.

• As with all these sketches I'm hoping that more information will become available.

• A brother in Germany – who wants his name withheld – referred me to many of CAC's personal references in his Letters, etc., which saved me a great deal of searching.

Thank you too for your kind remarks as to MB. As you will know, words of encouragement in a work that involves much labour – hewing of wood and drawing of water – are always welcome.

It is difficult to say how strong the interest in MB is on a purely numerical basis as the number of guests may seem small compared to some sites.

• Of course there are no doubt visitors who do not sign in, as well.

• But the quality of interest is quite high, as you may see from comments in the Guest Book and the Mailbox.

• Check the correspondence with John Vedder, whom you may know.

Also I have had the privilege of counselling a family who were in a group that was very demanding and damaging.

• The progress they have made is a cause of great thankfulness to our God. We are expecting a visit from them at the end of May.

• See the Guest Book and Mailbox for Karl and Peggy Paluga, and Ashley Dickinson.

Please visit MB whenever you can, as I try to add new items monthly – for the present at least.

• Of course, I will be glad to hear from you at any time.

With love in our Lord Jesus to you and your family, Gordon.

From: Max S. Weremchuk
Thu, 4 May 2000

Dear Gordon,
Thank you for your mail.

Yes, many have complained about the biography not being that – namely a real biography.

• It only deals with part of Darby's life. Yes, but I did that purposely.

• Years ago I delved in deep as to Bethesda and Park Street – but this will really help no one.

Since the Darby biography is out of print now I considered doing a revised version for the year 2000 last year and was encouraged by others to do so.

• I dug in again. Deeply. Uncovered a few additional nuggets, but the rest was so depressing with all the strife, divisions, contradictions and so on that I gave it up.

• There are simply more edifying things to pursue.

My biography is incomplete – I well know its shortcomings – but I feel I have captured the main thrust, that which Darby wanted conveyed through his ministry.

• I feel I was fair in my presentation. Criticism ranged between the book being slander and a eulogy. Oh well.

I grew up under Jake Redekop's ministry.

I have asked a brother in England to send you copies of several of my papers.

• I do not know if you will want to remain in touch with me after reading them – but I'll take the risk.

• If you find anything to be useful you are welcome to quote and distribute freely.

Yours in Christ, Max.

From: Max S. Weremchuk
Thu, 4 May 2000

Here I am again. In case the brother in England does not have these I've attached two papers which have the current Brethren problems you mentioned as a background as well as a few other items.

When you get the pamphlets from England the chronological order is:

1. You Ran Well
2. Off-Track
3. Can We Recover.

Yours in Christ, Max.

To: Max S. Weremchuk
Sun, 07 May 2000

Dear Max,

Thank you very much for the articles you sent and permission to "quote and distribute freely".

• When I have thoroughly read them and the ones coming from England I will get back to you. I hope these last will also be in computer format if possible.

• Perhaps I have missed something in a cursory reading, and the other documents may clarify things,

• but I am not sure of the particular reasons for the recent division or understand the terms "Wayne Decision vs. 'New' Movement" which some have used,

• and whether your leaving was connected with these happenings. But I will wait in patience.

There would have to be something very serious and fundamental – in my judgment at least – in your papers to make me want to discontinue our contact,

• and I do not expect to find anything of that nature. "Love … does not impute evil", 1 Cor. 13: 4-5.

My comments on the length of the biography was not a complaint.

• I appreciate your labour and consider your presentation to be eminently fair and cannot understand the criticism of it ranging from being a slander to a eulogy.

• I honour and respect Mr. Darby – and others as well – as a faithful servant of the Lord. Too many go further and dishonour both the Lord and His servants by revering them as superhuman.

• While we should always be ready to receive godly counsel from our brethren, it seems that there are always some professional critics.

• The translators of the Authorized Version anticipated being "maligned by by selfconceited Brethren, who run their own ways, and give liking unto nothing, but what is framed by themselves, and hammered on their anvil". Paul knew such things as well. 1 Cor. 4:1-5.

Yes, much of the history of brethren –individually and collectively – is depressing.

• In MB objectives I say, "Some negative features can't be avoided, but my intent is to present a positive and comprehensive outline of the history and ministry of the recovery of the truth".

Certainly a revised edition would entail much labour.

• However, failing that, if you desire to share the "few additional nuggets" they could be added under your name to Biography: J. N. Darby.

• I am sure that, as interest develops, a reprint at least will be desirable.

With love in our Lord Jesus, Gordon.

To: Max S. Weremchuk
Mon, 29 May 2000

Dear Max,
I received four of your papers from Ralph Sambrook today – and thank you for them, and thank Ralph for his service.

• It will take some time, with other demands on my time, for me to properly go through them which I'm looking forward to doing.

• I will then be in touch with you, but if you wish to contact me in the meantime please don't hesitate.

Yours in our Lord Jesus, Gordon.

From: Max S. Weremchuk
Tue, 21 Aug 2001

Hi again!
Do you have any idea where more information on F. W. Grant is to be had?

• Sure there is all the standard stuff in the major publications – but that isn't much.

• No archives? No pictures? No collection of letters somewhere? No family members with recollections?

• I would be very grateful if anybody could help out.

To Max S. Weremchuk
Tue, 21 Aug 2001

Dear Max,
Glad to hear from you again after such a long time.

There are several references to FWG, and one photo, on MB but I think all or most are generally available, except perhaps for the comments in History: FER in America.

• Surely Loizeaux Brothers would have some details in their archives.

• There are a number of letters of JND to R. T. Grant – FWG's brother, I believe – identified on STEM's Darby Disk.

• I seem to recall a hymn by FWG in the old 'Hymns of Grace and Truth' but my copy has very inconveniently disappeared.

I've posted a 'Bulletin' on "Site News" and will pass on any replies to you. I too would be interested in any further information you may receive from other sources.

Yours in our Lord Jesus, Gordon.

Frrom Max S. Weremchuk
Tue, 30 Apr 2002

Hi Gordon,
It has been sometime, but I thought I'd write and ask if you have any suggestions.

• I have decided on doing a new Darby biography – not just a revision of the old one.

• The publisher of the first edition is interested in a re-print, but is not willing/able to make the additions and changes I would like. So, writing a new one seems better than a "revised" one.

• What do you think? Any suggestions?

What is becoming clearer to me is that the roots or causes of the 'Brethren Movement' were not prophecy.

• A lot of studies go at things from this angle. Prophecy came in and overshadowed everything later.

• The first 'Brethren' were concerned about unity, worship and ministry.
  • Same thing here in Germany in the 1850's with Carl Brockhaus.

• They were not and did not become as famous as Darby, but they were the nucleus and had more-or-less common burdens and motivations.

• The members of the 'nucleus' faded in importance as the movement got rolling and Darby became a prominent figure.

• Darby was very hesitant and careful. His coming around and finally taking a more definite stand seems to coincide with the resurgence in prophecy which later took place –
  • though even then he was not 'fixed' as fast as some followers would like to have him.

• But I guess it was prophecy that catapulted the 'Brethren' into world consciousness.

Here I see a problem. Other believers were ready to accept 'Brethren' views on prophecy – which are inherently sensational –

• but reluctant on the unity, worship, ministry aspect. America is a good example.

• Today we see the results worldwide of groups and believers not in the least associated with Darby or the "Brethren" espousing his/their prophetic views –

• while at the same time neglecting the Church or 'Assembly' aspects. I feel this to be a serious loss.

Contrary to a 'Brethren' axiom – which came about later – I do not believe that a right understanding of the Church's 'hope' in the "Brethren" view – i.e. the pre-trib rapture – is necessary to a right understanding of the Church.

• The earliest of 'Brethren' were quite right on the Church before the prophetic aspect came in and dominated the movement from then on.

Today you see Christians getting all excited about Israel and wanting to contribute to the building of the temple and so on

• – and yet so deplorably ignorant as to Assembly principles and true worship and so on.

• They are so enthusiastic about something that has nothing to do with them.

• And, if their view were correct, they are supporting something which means the death of thousands or millions of Jews before things get better.

I was very happy to discover your Darby impressions of Wigram. This is very valuable.

• Anything else of this nature which might be useful for a new biography?

Yours, Max.

To: Max Weremchuk
Mon, 06 May 2002

Dear Max,
Yes, it has been sometime since we last corresponded, and I'm very glad to hear from you again.

It is quite a task to take on writing a new biography of JND but it would seem to be warranted if you have sufficient fresh material and editorial commentary. It would doubtless be welcomed by many.

• The importance of a fair treatment of this valued servant cannot be estimated.

I hope you would be able to make use of the text of your original work from computer files or through scanning to reduce the sheer amount of labour required.

• You are welcome to use JND's impressions of GVW and any other useful items from MB in the new biography.

If you decide to expand your coverage, some remarks on his early service and conflicts in Switzerland would be welcome.

• This would especially relate to your view that prophecy was not the main element in the rise of the movement.

• Some details of his extensive labours abroad would also help round out the biography.

Regarding your remarks on prophecy and on "the right understanding of the church", you might be interested in some related items, to which I refer you to save repetition:

• My Answer 2: The Powercourt Meeting

• My Answer 2: The Rapture

• My Stand 2: Use of Ministry

• My Stand 2: Miles Stanford

• Guests: My Stand 3: Ministry of CAC

• History: JND, An Unfriendly Appraisal: Asceticism

• Doctrine: The Lord's Coming: Introduction and Reading

  – this last is an important evidence that the brethren whose ministry is presented on MB, while firmly holding to the pre-tribulation rapture, felt that it had been overemphasized for personal benefit and to the detriment of the truth of the Lord's return to take up His rights on the earth.

I quite agree "that the roots or causes of the 'Brethren Movement' were not prophecy", although the movement was certainly affected by the interest in prophecy which began at the Powerscourt meetings.

However I'm not sure that "the earliest of 'Brethren' were quite right on the Church before the prophetic aspect came in".

• You may mean those in Dublin but even those did not understand everything all at once, although they may have had it in embryo.

• Certainly the situations at Plymouth and Bristol do not indicate a right understanding of the assembly and its functioning, let alone its heavenly origin, character and destiny.

• The prominent personalities, George Muller and B. W. Newton, if I recall correctly, did not accept the so-called pre-tribulation rapture and this, along with other factors, may well have affected their understanding of the assembly.

Some thoughts in connection with the early brethren and their understanding of the assembly, particularly as to worship, and the opening up of matters in subsequent ministry, can be found in:

• Studies: The Lord's Supper and the Service of God.

Perhaps you can enlighten me but I'm not aware of any believers who have arrived at a right understanding of the assembly from an ignorance or refusal of the pre-tribulation rapture.

• At the same time there do not seem to be many who have done so – including so-called 'brethren' – even if they do hold the pre-tribulation rapture.

I agree with you on the inconsistency of many groups in adopting teaching from brethren on the rapture – as well as dispensationalism – but ignoring or refusing teaching on the assembly. This is deplorable.

The occupation of many with Israel at the present time, to which you refer, is an evidence of the earthliness that permeates the public church.

Thanks for writing and sharing your exercises. I'll be glad to hear of your progress in this new work and, if you desire, to keep MB's guests informed.

In our Lord Jesus, Gordon.

From: Max S. Weremchuk
Sun, 26 May 2002

Hi Gordon!
Yes, you are right in noting:

"Perhaps you can enlighten me but I'm not aware of any believers who have arrived at a right understanding of the assembly from an ignorance or refusal of the pre-tribulation rapture. At the same time there do not seem to be many who have done so – including so-called 'brethren' – even if they do hold the pre-tribulation rapture".   GAR

I also agree that the early Brethren didn't have everything 'right' as to the Assembly from the start.

• Growth and understanding based on this growth and awareness were definitely necessary.

• Nevertheless I feel that the views on prophecy – which came in much later – swamped things.

• The 'recovery' of the Rapture came to be seen as a kind of reward for the faithfulness up to that point, as the end result of the direction Brethren had taken and were going.

• After that it has always been presented together and inseparable. This is what I question.

I deny that you can only appreciate your true position in Christ and thus properly understand what the Church is if you hold to the pre-Trib Rapture and all it entails.

• I am not Jewish or earthly if I don't see it the way Brethren do.

• I do not forfeit anything dealing with the Assembly's true character because of it, though this has often been said and continues to be – and so all believe it.

• At least there is one piece of evidence to the contrary: me! :-)

Yours in Him, Max.

From: Max S. Weremchuk
Tue, 11 Mar 200r

Hi Gordon!
I thought I'd write and tell you how I am making progress in the revision of the Darby biography.

• There is much work ahead of me. Instead of bringing certain points to a conclusion I find more and more avenues of research opening up.

• This time around I would very much like to be able to reconstruct the times. They were different. Even the language. We easily fool ourselves into believing we understand how things were.

What is becoming ever clearer to me is that our picture of Darby is very incomplete.

• The published material is not enough. Scratching only the surface. Too much has been edited and left out. The man is missing.

• We need more material like Darby's letter to his brother Horatio (published in 'Leap Castle. A Place and Its People' written by Marigold Freeman-Attwood, a Darby descendant) to complete the picture.

I realize I am risking things somewhat, coming out with items from my research before the book's publication. Someone might 'jump the gun' on me through this.

• We authors/researchers can be very "possessive" of what we feel “we” have uncovered.

• But in the long run what I'm after is the truth. Being able to reconstruct things as they actually were is my goal.

• An interaction with your readers as I go along may prove to be helpful in correcting me or adding to the material.

There are actually 3 major items at the moment. I'll send them to you in parts or instalments as they would be too long all at once.

• The last item is perhaps the more important one, in any case it has greater consequences and requires a major correction in my biography with important outworkings.

Every blessing, Max Weremchuk.

To: Max S. Weremchuk
Tue, 11 Mar 2003

Dear Max,
Thanks for instalments 1 and 2 of your research papers. I gather that you are happy to have them posted on MB in view of possible comments for guests. If I am mistaken please let me know by return.

• I do appreciate you sharing this interesting research information and pray you will be helped in the 'new' and/or 'revised' biography of JND.

Affectionately in our Lord Jesus, Gordon.

From: Max S. Weremchuk
Thu, 13 Mar 2003

Sure you can. I hope it can help to get more information.

The 3rd instalment is ready and waiting, but I want to get one clarification from a source before I send it.

Every blessing, Max.

To: Max S. Weremchuk
Sat, 15 Mar 2003

Dear Max,
Received the 3rd instalment and all 3 are now posted as Biography: JND Research. See the 'Bulletins' and 'New Activity' on 'Site News'.

• I'll be glad to see any further items you discover and, of course, will pass on any comments.

• In connection with your interest in the times in which JND lived, have a look at
  History: JND: An Unfriendly Appraisal.

May the Lord bless you in this valuable work.

Affectionately in Him, Gordon.

From: Max S. Weremchuk
Mon, 17 Mar 2003

Hi Gordon,
From the start of my research on the Darby biography to its completion in the late 1980's I was not an 'academic' in any sense of the word.

The whole of this letter is in Guests: My Answer 4: Biography: Early Brethren.

What do you think? Yours in Christ, Max.

To: Max S. Weremchuk
Tue, 18 Mar 2003

Dear Max, Thanks for sharing your 'thoughts'. I appreciate your confidence in doing so

The whole of this letter and some subsequent letters are in Guests: My Answer 4: Biography: Early Brethren.

Thanks again for sharing. I trust that it will stimulate and encourage other guests of 'My Brethren'.

Affectionately in our Lord Jesus, Gordon.

From: Max S. Weremchuk
Tue, 24 Jun 2003

Hi Gordon,
I am presently going through the Fry MS – the large volume collection – and writing out various sections in arranged thematic groups. This makes comparing accounts so much easier.

From: Max S. Weremchuk
Wed, 9 Jul 2003

The attached file [#7 - Dates, etc.] is a work in progress. I would be very thankful for any corrections, suggestions, or additions.

Thanks! Max.

To: Max S. Weremchuk
Wed, 9 Jul 2003

Dear Max,
Thanks. Looks interesting! Will get back to you. Gordon

The balance of this letter is in Biography: G. V. Wigram as 'Research by Max S. Weremchuk'.

To: Max S. Weremchuk
Mon, 18 Aug 2003

Dear Max,
Thanks for copy re 'Wolff' for JND Research. We are on restricted power use because of effects of power blackout, so I just acknowledge. In Him, Gordon.

To: Max S. Weremchuk
Mon, 1 Dec 2003

Dear Max,
How good to hear from you again! I must admit to becoming slow in keeping up valuable contacts.

Thanks for the further research info on the 'Vaughan Family' connection to JND.

By the way, did anything ever develop on the d'Esterre connection?

In our Lord Jesus, Gordon.

To: Max S. Weremchuk
Thus, 18 March 2004

Dear Max,
You may have seen the following – 'Darby of the Leap' – which I have posted on MB in 'Biography: JND'.

• Some of the [notes] were already included and I have added a few more, plus a little editing. Any comments?

In Him, Gordon.

From: Max S. Weremchuk
Sat, 20 March 2004

Hi Gordon!
Yes, I've known of this paper on Leap Castle for sometime. It is part of Anna Stoney's unpublished memoirs.

• (No, I do not have them, nor have I seen them. I just know somebody who has them.

• This person has written, but not published, a biography of Darby and his family which makes everything else look like the scribbling of a 3 year old child and his work like Da Vinci's "Mona Lisa" in comparison.

• After seeing only a part of it I lost all heart in continuing with my own.

• And, no, I am not free to give further information. This person must himself judge as to finally publishing or not. I have pleaded with him to do so.)

Sadly, Miss Stoney's work is riddled with errors.

• E.g., the Vaughans connected with JND were not from Golden Grove, Hereford. Golden Grove was not in Hereford, but in Camarthenshire and the Vaughans from there had always been Roman Catholics. The Vaughans connected with JND were Unitarian.

• Judging from what I have read of Anne Darby's letter I don't think that the description that she was "of the old Puritan type" is accurate. Later in life she wrote to her son JND saying she had good arguments in favour of the Anglican Church against his objections to it.

• Anna Stoney was too young to have known Anne Darby personally and probably much of her mistakes can be understood and excused as due to youthful memories blurred through the passage of time.

All the best, Max.

To: Max S. Weremchuk
Mon, 22 March 2004

Dear Max,
Thanks for your prompt reply. Your comments on 'Darby of the Leap' are now in the preface to that article, which is being retained because of its 'human interest'.

• If my calculations are correct, Miss Stoney was about 82 at the time of writing – a very great age in those days – and so your remark as to "youthful memories blurred through the passage of time" is just.

• Miss Stoney's "unpublished memoirs" would be of great interest to many and I certainly hope that your contact will share them with others.

Of course, I cannot judge – as you can – of your contact's unpublished "biography of Darby and his family"

• but, being quite familiar with yours – perhaps you will excuse me saying – it seems that you may be placing too little value on your work and too much value on that of your contact.

• In any case, a published work – the first edition of which which has proved invaluable to many –
  • has far more value than an unpublished work which may remain so – for unknown reasons – despite your pleading.

• I'm deeply saddened that you say "I lost all heart in continuing with my own" and I do hope that you will reconsider and proceed with the work so well begun.

• How much would have been lost if Luke – I speak from a human viewpoint – had been deterred from writing his gospel because "many" had undertaken to write an account. Like 1: 1-3.

• May the Lord encourage you to finish what you have started "knowing that your toil is not in vain in the Lord", 1 Corinthians 15: 58.

Affectionately in our Lord Jesus, Gordon.

From: Max S. Weremchuk
Sun, 6 Jun 2004

Hi Gordon! Hope you both are doing well.

I've been silent for awhile because of other things I've been working on. In January a book of mine, 'Weil ihr aber Söhne seid' – 'Because You Are Sons' – came out.

After that I was involved in writing new chapters for the 2nd edition – which has more than doubled the contents. This is now completed.

• In this second edition I go more into Darby and the Brethren origins – particularly in the new Foreword and first 2 chapters.

• I could make use of what I had learned from my studies in the orgins of Zionism. Actually these studies have provided me with the answers I was looking for as to the 'why' in Darby's case.

• It is now so obvious and logical. Darby's develpment is hardly unique, but rather the result of a process set in motion long ago.

At present I have no plans to translate this work, or at least the respective parts, but it would be a valuable addition, I feel, to the other articles on your website because it contains some material I have not published there and also sums up several things in a helpful way. Gives a better perspective. <

Every blessing, Max.

To: Max S. Weremchuk
Tue, 29 Jun 2004

Dear Max,
Sorry for the delay in acknowledging, but glad to hear you are again working on the JND biography.

Of course we are always interested in your research, but are most doubtful of any connection of JND with what we understand of 'Zionism'.

• In my reading I have always been impressed with JND, and others, basing their beliefs squarely on Scripture rather than being influenced by the popular, or unpopular, views of their contemporaries – as we also seek to do.

• That being the case we are hesitant to post anything that would support so-called 'Christian Zionism' with which we do not sympathize.

• But I may have misunderstood your last research notes.

Affectionately in our Lord Jesus, Gordon.

Your guest entries and messages will show that the continuation of My Brethren is important to you.

Page Top